RECHTFERTIG v. Spiering

Supreme Court of Minnesota

RECHTFERTIG v. Spiering

740 N.W.2d 774, 2007 Minn. LEXIS 670, 2007 WL 3292101

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedNovember 6, 2007

DocketA07-1306

StatusPublished

This text of 740 N.W.2d 774 (RECHTFERTIG v. Spiering) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

RECHTFERTIG v. Spiering, 740 N.W.2d 774, 2007 Minn. LEXIS 670, 2007 WL 3292101 (Mich. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

*775 ORDER

RUSSELL A. ANDERSON, Chief Justice.

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed June 19, 2007, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that [s]ummary af-firmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*775 ORDER

RUSSELL A. ANDERSON, Chief Justice.

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed June 19, 2007, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that [s]ummary af-firmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

740 N.W.2d 774, 2007 Minn. LEXIS 670, 2007 WL 3292101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rechtfertig-v-spiering-minn-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack