Recht v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Recht v. State

344 So. 2d 885, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15279

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 25, 1977

DocketNo. 75-984

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 344 So. 2d 885 (Recht v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Recht v. State, 344 So. 2d 885, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15279 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Gary Albert Recht, was charged by an amended information with delivery of methylenedioxyamphetamine, a hallucinogenic drug commonly called MDA. Appellant entered a plea of nolo contendere to the charge. The trial court, withheld adjudication of guilt, suspended the imposition of sentence, and placed the appellant on probation. Subsequently, on April 28, 1975, an order was entered revoking probation. Also entered on April 28, 1975 was a judgment of adjudication of guilt with the imposition of a sentence. On May 22, 1975 a notice of appeal from the order revoking probation was filed. No appeal was taken from the entry of the judgment of guilty and imposition of ’sentence.

On appeal appellant attacks the judgment and sentence from which no appeal was taken and over which, by lack thereof, we have no jurisdiction. Therefore, no error having been demonstrated by appellant as to the order revoking probation, we affirm.

Affirmed.

CROSS and ALDERMAN, JJ., concur. DOWNEY, J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Gary Albert Recht, was charged by an amended information with delivery of methylenedioxyamphetamine, a hallucinogenic drug commonly called MDA. Appellant entered a plea of nolo contendere to the charge. The trial court, withheld adjudication of guilt, suspended the imposition of sentence, and placed the appellant on probation. Subsequently, on April 28, 1975, an order was entered revoking probation. Also entered on April 28, 1975 was a judgment of adjudication of guilt with the imposition of a sentence. On May 22, 1975 a notice of appeal from the order revoking probation was filed. No appeal was taken from the entry of the judgment of guilty and imposition of ’sentence.

On appeal appellant attacks the judgment and sentence from which no appeal was taken and over which, by lack thereof, we have no jurisdiction. Therefore, no error having been demonstrated by appellant as to the order revoking probation, we affirm.

Affirmed.

CROSS and ALDERMAN, JJ., concur. DOWNEY, J., dissents with opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

344 So. 2d 885, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/recht-v-state-fladistctapp-1977.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack