Receivable Funding Corp. v. Barnett Bank of South Florida, N.A.
This text of 587 So. 2d 1188 (Receivable Funding Corp. v. Barnett Bank of South Florida, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
AFFIRMED. We find sufficient evidence in the record to sustain the trial court’s conclusion that appellant was properly served process, by service on its agent under section 48.081(2), Florida Statutes (1989). While the evidence was conflicting, the trial court had before it deposition testimony and documents sufficiently connecting the agent to the appellant for purposes of utilizing section 48.081(2) to serve appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
587 So. 2d 1188, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 10995, 1991 WL 225547, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/receivable-funding-corp-v-barnett-bank-of-south-florida-na-fladistctapp-1991.