Recardo v. State

412 So. 2d 30, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19605
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 2, 1982·No. No. 81-1606·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s probation was revoked for failure to pay court costs and costs of probation- supervision. This was improper because there was no evidence from which the court could find that appellant had the financial ability to pay such costs. Coxon v. State, 365 So.2d 1067 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for a new hearing on the question of appellant’s ability to pay.

GRIMES, A. C. J., and RYDER and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Recardo v. State, 412 So. 2d 30, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19605 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

412 So. 2d 30 (Recardo v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coxon v. State
365 So. 2d 1067 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)