Recardo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Recardo v. State

412 So. 2d 30, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19605

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 2, 1982

DocketNo. 81-1606

StatusPublished

This text of 412 So. 2d 30 (Recardo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Recardo v. State, 412 So. 2d 30, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19605 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s probation was revoked for failure to pay court costs and costs of probation- supervision. This was improper because there was no evidence from which the court could find that appellant had the financial ability to pay such costs. Coxon v. State, 365 So.2d 1067 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for a new hearing on the question of appellant’s ability to pay.

GRIMES, A. C. J., and RYDER and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s probation was revoked for failure to pay court costs and costs of probation- supervision. This was improper because there was no evidence from which the court could find that appellant had the financial ability to pay such costs. Coxon v. State, 365 So.2d 1067 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for a new hearing on the question of appellant’s ability to pay.

GRIMES, A. C. J., and RYDER and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

412 So. 2d 30, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/recardo-v-state-fladistctapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack