Recar v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Recar v. State

519 S.W.3d 524, 2017 WL 2436870, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 547

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 6, 2017

DocketNo. ED 104682

StatusPublished

This text of 519 S.W.3d 524 (Recar v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Recar v. State, 519 S.W.3d 524, 2017 WL 2436870, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 547 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kevin Recar (“Movant”) appeals from the motion court’s order and judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. Movant pleaded guilty to sodomy in the second degree in violation of § 566.061. Movant claims his trial counsel was ineffective for agreeing to a continuance in spite of his request for a speedy trial and alleges he was prejudiced by his counsel’s actions. We affirm the judgment of the motion court.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kevin Recar (“Movant”) appeals from the motion court’s order and judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. Movant pleaded guilty to sodomy in the second degree in violation of § 566.061. Movant claims his trial counsel was ineffective for agreeing to a continuance in spite of his request for a speedy trial and alleges he was prejudiced by his counsel’s actions. We affirm the judgment of the motion court.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

519 S.W.3d 524, 2017 WL 2436870, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 547, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/recar-v-state-moctapp-2017.