Rebuilt Range Co. v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad

187 A. 331, 14 N.J. Misc. 803, 1936 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 259
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedOctober 9, 1936
StatusPublished

This text of 187 A. 331 (Rebuilt Range Co. v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rebuilt Range Co. v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad, 187 A. 331, 14 N.J. Misc. 803, 1936 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 259 (N.J. 1936).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed, on the authority of Sprotte v. Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Co., 90 N. J. L. 720; 101 Atl. Rep. 518.

We find a sufficient basis in the proofs for the findings that the stoves, shipped as they were in open crates, and therefore subject to inspection, were in good condition when delivered to the initial carrier, and, consequently, that the conceded damage occurred thereafter.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sprotte v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad
101 A. 518 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
187 A. 331, 14 N.J. Misc. 803, 1936 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rebuilt-range-co-v-delaware-lackawanna-western-railroad-nj-1936.