Rebuilt Range Co. v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad
187 A. 331, 14 N.J. Misc. 803, 1936 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 259
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed, on the authority of Sprotte v. Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Co., 90 N. J. L. 720; 101 Atl. Rep. 518.
We find a sufficient basis in the proofs for the findings that the stoves, shipped as they were in open crates, and therefore subject to inspection, were in good condition when delivered to the initial carrier, and, consequently, that the conceded damage occurred thereafter.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rebuilt Range Co. v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad, 187 A. 331, 14 N.J. Misc. 803, 1936 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 259 (N.J. 1936).
187 A. 331 (Rebuilt Range Co. v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sprotte v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad
101 A. 518 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1917)