Rebuildables Const, Pets v. WCAB (Clouthier)
This text of Rebuildables Const, Pets v. WCAB (Clouthier) (Rebuildables Const, Pets v. WCAB (Clouthier)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
REBUILDABLES CONSTRUCTION, LLC, : No. 79 MAL 2016 DONEGAL MUTUAL INSURANCE : GROUP AND ATLANTIC STATES : INSURANCE CO., : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court Petitioners : : : v. : : : WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD (CLOUTHIER, UNINSURED : EMPLOYERS GUARANTY FUND, ACS : CLAIMS SERVICE, 7400 ROOSEVELT : APARTMENTS, US ADJUSTMENT : CORPORATION AND JOEL BLISS T/A : BLISS CONTRACTING), : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 1st day of June, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
DENIED.
The application for supersedeas is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rebuildables Const, Pets v. WCAB (Clouthier), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rebuildables-const-pets-v-wcab-clouthier-pa-2016.