Rebollar v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rebollar v. State

752 So. 2d 1287, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3383, 2000 WL 293212

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 22, 2000

DocketNo. 2D98-4871

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 752 So. 2d 1287 (Rebollar v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rebollar v. State, 752 So. 2d 1287, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3383, 2000 WL 293212 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders¹ appeal, appellant’s counsel raises three issues of possible error. After a thorough review of the record, we find no merit in the first two issues and affirm the revocation of appellant’s probation and his resulting sentence without discussion. We do, however, agree with appellant’s contention in Issue III, that a sentencing memorandum is insufficient to serve as a written order of revocation. We, accordingly, remand with directions for entry of such an order. See Wagner v. State, 744 So.2d 1155 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); Grantham v. State, 735 So.2d 525 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999).

Remanded with directions.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and PARKER and SALCINES, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders¹ appeal, appellant’s counsel raises three issues of possible error. After a thorough review of the record, we find no merit in the first two issues and affirm the revocation of appellant’s probation and his resulting sentence without discussion. We do, however, agree with appellant’s contention in Issue III, that a sentencing memorandum is insufficient to serve as a written order of revocation. We, accordingly, remand with directions for entry of such an order. See Wagner v. State, 744 So.2d 1155 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); Grantham v. State, 735 So.2d 525 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999).

Remanded with directions.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and PARKER and SALCINES, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

752 So. 2d 1287, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3383, 2000 WL 293212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rebollar-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack