Reber v. Dowling

65 Miss. 259
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1887
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 65 Miss. 259 (Reber v. Dowling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reber v. Dowling, 65 Miss. 259 (Mich. 1887).

Opinion

Campbell, J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court.,

[264]*264All uncertainty as to the description of the lot was removed by the evidence.

By the will of Thomas Dowling, the title of the lot was vested in the four devisees and tenants in common with cross remainders between them and the ultimate limitation to the last survivor. On the death of each the estate vested in the survivors and not in the heirs of the decedent. Therefore, the whole estate, on the death of the other three devisees, vested ip. Thomas J. Dowling, and the children of John Belzer Cullen, one of the devisees, deceased, never had any estate in the land or right to redeem it. The decree should have been for the confirmation of complainant’s title to the whole, and not merely the half interest.

Reversed and decree here as indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nelson v. Iglehart
106 A.2d 115 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1954)
Stockstill v. Bennett
61 So. 2d 154 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1952)
Loper v. Hinds Land Co.
58 So. 2d 88 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1952)
Brown v. Womack
178 So. 785 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1938)
Armstrong v. Thomas
72 So. 1006 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
65 Miss. 259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reber-v-dowling-miss-1887.