Rebecca Leigh Flores and Fernando Medina v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
This text of Rebecca Leigh Flores and Fernando Medina v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (Rebecca Leigh Flores and Fernando Medina v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS
13-17-00167-CV
Rebecca Leigh Flores and Fernando Medina v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
On Appeal from the 92nd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas Trial Cause No. C-5429-14-A
JUDGMENT
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on
appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court
orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged
against appellants, Rebecca Leigh Flores and Fernando Medina.
We further order this decision certified below for observance.
June 7, 2018
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rebecca Leigh Flores and Fernando Medina v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rebecca-leigh-flores-and-fernando-medina-v-state-farm-mutual-automobile-texapp-2018.