Rebecca Jo Stevens v. Joseph Harry Shaffield, III, and Jane Holinka, as Attorney-In-Fact for Joseph Harry Shaffield, III
This text of Rebecca Jo Stevens v. Joseph Harry Shaffield, III, and Jane Holinka, as Attorney-In-Fact for Joseph Harry Shaffield, III (Rebecca Jo Stevens v. Joseph Harry Shaffield, III, and Jane Holinka, as Attorney-In-Fact for Joseph Harry Shaffield, III) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas March 29, 2019
No. 04-18-00666-CV
Rebecca JO STEVENS, Appellant
v.
Joseph “Harry” SHAFFIELD, III, and Jane Holinka, as Attorney-in-Fact for Joseph “Harry” Shaffield, III, Appellees
From the 451st Judicial District Court, Kendall County, Texas Trial Court No. 17-553 Honorable Bill R. Palmer, Judge Presiding
ORDER This court’s mandate in this appeal issued on February 5, 2019. On March 27, 2019, a motion for leave to withdraw as attorney of record was filed. The motion is DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 18, 19.
It is so ORDERED on this 29th day of March, 2019.
PER CURIAM
ATTESTED TO: ________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE, Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rebecca Jo Stevens v. Joseph Harry Shaffield, III, and Jane Holinka, as Attorney-In-Fact for Joseph Harry Shaffield, III, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rebecca-jo-stevens-v-joseph-harry-shaffield-iii-and-jane-holinka-as-texapp-2019.