Rebecca Jo Stevens v. Joseph "Harry" Shaffield, and Jane Holinka, as Attorney-In-Fact for Joseph "Harry" Shaffield, III
This text of Rebecca Jo Stevens v. Joseph "Harry" Shaffield, and Jane Holinka, as Attorney-In-Fact for Joseph "Harry" Shaffield, III (Rebecca Jo Stevens v. Joseph "Harry" Shaffield, and Jane Holinka, as Attorney-In-Fact for Joseph "Harry" Shaffield, III) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-18-00666-CV
Rebecca Jo STEVENS, Appellant
v.
Joseph “Harry” SHAFFIELD, III, and Jane Holinka, as Attorney-in-Fact for Joseph “Harry” Shaffield, III, Appellees
From the 451st Judicial District Court, Kendall County, Texas Trial Court No. 17-553 Honorable Bill R. Palmer, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
Delivered and Filed: November 21, 2018
DISMISSED
Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. We grant the motion and dismiss the
appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Costs of appeal are taxed against appellant. See id. 42.1(d)
(“Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rebecca Jo Stevens v. Joseph "Harry" Shaffield, and Jane Holinka, as Attorney-In-Fact for Joseph "Harry" Shaffield, III, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rebecca-jo-stevens-v-joseph-harry-shaffield-and-jane-holinka-as-texapp-2018.