Rebeca Vargas Fuenmayor v. Ruth Vargas Fuenmayor
This text of Rebeca Vargas Fuenmayor v. Ruth Vargas Fuenmayor (Rebeca Vargas Fuenmayor v. Ruth Vargas Fuenmayor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed February 18, 2026. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D24-1996 Lower Tribunal No. 19-11000-CA-01 ________________
Rebeca Vargas Fuenmayor, Appellant,
vs.
Ruth Vargas Fuenmayor, et al., Appellees.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Carlos Guzman, Judge.
Colson Hicks Eidson, P.A., and Thomas Allen Kroeger, for appellant.
Lubell | Rosen, and Lori A. Sochin, Ronald G. Neiwirth and Dora Acherman, for appellees Ruth Vargas Fuenmayor and Reelaiah Silva Vargas; Ocean Bank Legal Department, and Brian Recor for appellee Ocean Bank.
Before FERNANDEZ, GORDO and BOKOR JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See 951 Harbor Drive, LLC v. SD Constr., LLC, 394 So. 3d
690, 695 (Fla. 3d DCA 2024) (“On motion for summary judgment, the trial
court may consider only matters raised in the pleadings.” (citing Wilson v.
Stone, 172 So. 3d 559, 560 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015))); see also Fla. R. Civ. P.
1.110(b)(2) (“A pleading which sets forth a claim for relief, whether an original
claim, counterclaim, crossclaim, or third-party claim, must state a cause of
action and must contain . . . a short and plain statement of the ultimate facts
showing that the pleader is entitled to relief . . . .”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rebeca Vargas Fuenmayor v. Ruth Vargas Fuenmayor, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rebeca-vargas-fuenmayor-v-ruth-vargas-fuenmayor-fladistctapp-2026.