Reazkallah,, Maikel v. ABM Industries, Inc.

2018 TN WC 184
CourtTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
DecidedNovember 19, 2018
Docket2017-06-1519
StatusPublished

This text of 2018 TN WC 184 (Reazkallah,, Maikel v. ABM Industries, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reazkallah,, Maikel v. ABM Industries, Inc., 2018 TN WC 184 (Tenn. Super. Ct. 2018).

Opinion

FILED Nov 19, 2018 08:51 AM(CT) TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT NASHVILLE

Maikel Reazkallah, ) Docket No. 2017-06-1519 Employee, ) v. ) ABM Industries, Inc., ) State File No. 50395-2017 Employer, ) And ) Agri-General Ins. Co., ) Judge Kenneth M. Switzer Carrier. )

COMPENSATION HEARING ORDER

This case came before the Court on November 15, 2018, for a compensation hearing. Maikel Reazkallah alleged a shoulder injury while working for ABM Industries, Inc. The issues are Mr. Reazkallah s entitlement to additional temporary partial disability benefits and permanent partial disability benefits. 1 The Court holds he is not entitled to these benefits but may return to the authorized physician for any care related to the work injury for the rest of his life.

History of Claim

The Court found the following facts after an expedited hearing and summarizes them below to provide context to this decision.

Mr. Reazkallah began full-time work for ABM as a cabin cleaner on airplanes in May 2017. After his hire, he informed his supervisor that medical restrictions from a

1 The Court's authority is limited within the Workers' Compensation Law to "determine claims for compensation" and, following an evidentiary hearing, to issue an order "for payment of benefits." Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 50-6-238(a)(3), 50-6-239(c)(2) (2018). Mr. Reazkallah requested that this Court order ABM to discipline a former supervisor and take steps to remediate problems regarding his TSA security clearance and credit score. These requests exceed the Court's authority and will not be addressed, other than to note that after the hearing ABM on its own initiative wrote a letter to Bay Area Credit Service asking that it take action to correct Mr. Reazkallah's credit score.

1 previous, unrelated injury prevented him from lifting any item heavier than ten pounds and limited the use of his right shoulder. On July 6, despite these restrictions, the supervisor asked Mr. Reazkallah to place a heavy bag of trash inside a dumpster with walls higher than his shoulders, resulting in injury to his right shoulder.

ABM provided authorized treatment at U.S. HealthWorks. At the first visit, providers diagnosed a shoulder strain and assigned restrictions. The restrictions remained in place, with minor changes, until the final visit on August 21, when the providers discharged Mr. Reazkallah and returned him to full-duty at maximum medical improvement. ABM filed a C-32 confirming the maximum medical impairment date of August 21, 2017. Dr. Harold Nevels, the authorized physician, assigned a zero-percent permanent impairment. Mr. Reazkallah did not introduce any medical evidence with a different impairment rating or referring him to a specialist. He testified that he wishes to see "any doctor" at the compensation hearing. ABM's lawyer stated that Mr. Reazkallah never requested this but agreed that he may see Dr. Nevels for treatment related to the work injury. Therefore, this is not an issue.

As for his claim for unpaid bills, Mr. Reazkallah received a statement from his emergency room visit totaling $1,173 after the work injury. ABM agreed to pay this bill at mediation. Mr. Reazkallah stated at this hearing that ABM paid it, and he introduced no other unpaid medical bills. Therefore, this is also no longer an issue.

Concerning his claim for temporary disability benefits, after the expedited hearing, the Court ordered payment of $1,19 5.49 for the time frame of July 11 through August 21. ABM complied with the order. At the compensation hearing Mr. Reazkallah introduced no additional medical records of restrictions after August 21, 2017. He simply argued that the sum was insufficient.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

Mr. Reazkallah must prove every element of his claim by a preponderance of the evidence at a compensation hearing.

The Court first considers Mr. Reazkallah's entitlement to additional temporary partial disability benefits. An injured worker may be entitled to temporary partial disability benefits when the temporary disability resulting from a work-related injury is not total. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-207(1)-(2). Temporary restrictions assigned by physicians during an injured worker's medical treatment do not establish an entitlement to continued temporary disability benefits if the employee is able to work without loss of income. Frye v. Vincent Printing Co., 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 34, at *16 (Aug. 2, 2016).

2 Here, Mr. Reazkallah did not satisfy his burden regarding the existence of temporary restrictions beyond those removed by Dr. Nevels on August 21, 2017. Mr. Reazkallah failed to offer any proof of additional restrictions beyond that date. He argued that the total paid under the expedited hearing order was insufficient. Section 50- 6-207(2)(A) limits an injured employee's temporary partial disability benefits to "sixty- six and two thirds percent" of the difference between the worker's average weekly wage at the time of the injury and the wage he earns in his partially disabled condition. 2 The statute gives the Court no discretion to raise that amount. Therefore, Mr. Reazkallah is not entitled to additional temporary disability benefits.

Second, according to the dispute certification notice, Mr. Reazkallah seeks permanent partial disability benefits. Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6- 20 17(3)(A) provides that these benefits are available "[i]n case of disability partial in character but adjudged to be permanent, at the time the employee reaches maximum medical improvement." In this case, Dr. Nevels found no permanent disability, and Mr. Reazkallah introduced no contrary evidence. The Court holds he is not entitled to these benefits.

In sum, Mr. Reazkallah has not shown entitlement by a preponderance of the evidence to temporary or permanent partial disability benefits.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:

1. Mr. Reazkallah's requests for additional temporary partial disability benefits and permanent partial disability benefits are denied.

2. ABM shall provide future, lifetime medical benefits for Mr. Reazkallah's work- related shoulder injury under Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6- 204(a)(l)(A). Dr. Nevels remains the treating physician.

3. ABM shall pay costs of $150.00 to the Court Clerk within five business days under Tennessee Compilation Rules and Regulations 0800-02-21-.07.

4. ABM shall prepare and file with the Court Clerk a Statistical Data Form (SD2) within ten business days of entry of this order.

5. Absent an appeal, this order shall become final thirty days after issuance.

2 ABM paid his full hourly wage when Mr. Reazkallah worked light duty.

3 ENTERED November 19,2018.

Court of Workers' Compensat n Claims

Exhibits: 1. Affidavit 2. First Report of Injury 3. Wage Statement 4. ~edicalrecords 5. Employee's Responses to Interrogatories 6. Total Health work restrictions 7. Employee "Transitional Duty" Agreement 8. AB~ payroll records for Mr. Reazkallah 9. Proof of compliance with Expedited Hearing Order lO.Form C-32/Final ~edical Report/Dr. Nevels' CV

Technical Record: 1. Petition for Benefit Determination 2. Dispute Certification Notice 3. Request for Expedited Hearing 4. Employer's and Carrier's Witness and Exhibit Statement 5. Employer's and Carrier's Expedited Hearing Brief 6. Employer's and Carrier's Amended Witness and Exhibit List 7.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 50-6-207
Tennessee § 50-6-207(1)
§ 50-6-238
Tennessee § 50-6-238(a)(3)
§ 50-6-239
Tennessee § 50-6-239(c)(7)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2018 TN WC 184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reazkallah-maikel-v-abm-industries-inc-tennworkcompcl-2018.