Reay v. Berlin & Jones Envelope Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Reay v. Berlin & Jones Envelope Co.

19 F. 311, 1884 U.S. App. LEXIS 2034

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

DecidedJanuary 23, 1884

StatusPublished

This text of 19 F. 311 (Reay v. Berlin & Jones Envelope Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reay v. Berlin & Jones Envelope Co., 19 F. 311, 1884 U.S. App. LEXIS 2034 (circtsdny 1884).

Pincite

Opinion

Wheeler, J.

This suit is brought upon the same patent, in the same manner, and involving the same questions as to its mainte[312]*312nance, as that of Reay v. Raynor, ante, 308. The cause is upheld for the same reasons, and the patent is sustained to the same extent, upon the same grounds, as in that case. Only the second, fourth and fifth claims are said to be infringed here. Of these only the second is held to be valid. The defendant appears to infringe this claim. Their machine has the arrangement of the table over the conveyor so that the blanks are held even and in place by the table while being'carried by the conveyor to the creasing box, as described in that claim.

Let a decree be entered for the oratrix accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wheeler, J.

This suit is brought upon the same patent, in the same manner, and involving the same questions as to its mainte[312]*312nance, as that of Reay v. Raynor, ante, 308. The cause is upheld for the same reasons, and the patent is sustained to the same extent, upon the same grounds, as in that case. Only the second, fourth and fifth claims are said to be infringed here. Of these only the second is held to be valid. The defendant appears to infringe this claim. Their machine has the arrangement of the table over the conveyor so that the blanks are held even and in place by the table while being'carried by the conveyor to the creasing box, as described in that claim.

Let a decree be entered for the oratrix accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 F. 311, 1884 U.S. App. LEXIS 2034, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reay-v-berlin-jones-envelope-co-circtsdny-1884.