Reaves v. State

944 So. 2d 1042, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 13230, 2006 WL 2265400
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Reaves v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 979 So. 2d 1066
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 9, 2006·No. No. 4D05-3482·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jason Reaves appeals the trial court’s order that summarily denied his motion for postconviction relief, motion to withdraw plea, or in the alternative, motion to correct illegal sentence. We affirm the denial of all claims except for claim 7.

In that claim, the defendant alleged ineffective assistance of counsel leading to his [1043]*1043involuntary plea of guilty. We remand for an evidentiary hearing or record attachments which refute his claim on this ground. See Wells v. State, 881 So.2d 54 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). See also Robinson v. State, 909 So.2d 497 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005); Patrick v. State, 830 So.2d 248 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

STONE, POLEN and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reaves v. State, 944 So. 2d 1042, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 13230, 2006 WL 2265400 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

944 So. 2d 1042 (Reaves v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Robinson v. State
909 So. 2d 497 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Wells v. State
881 So. 2d 54 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Patrick v. State
830 So. 2d 248 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)