Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Reaves v. State

Reaves v. State

944 So. 2d 1042, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 13230, 2006 WL 2265400
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 9, 2006
DocketNo. 4D05-3482
StatusPublished

This text of 944 So. 2d 1042 (Reaves v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reaves v. State, 944 So. 2d 1042, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 13230, 2006 WL 2265400 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jason Reaves appeals the trial court’s order that summarily denied his motion for postconviction relief, motion to withdraw plea, or in the alternative, motion to correct illegal sentence. We affirm the denial of all claims except for claim 7.

In that claim, the defendant alleged ineffective assistance of counsel leading to his [1043]*1043involuntary plea of guilty. We remand for an evidentiary hearing or record attachments which refute his claim on this ground. See Wells v. State, 881 So.2d 54 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). See also Robinson v. State, 909 So.2d 497 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005); Patrick v. State, 830 So.2d 248 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

STONE, POLEN and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Robinson v. State
909 So. 2d 497 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Wells v. State
881 So. 2d 54 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Patrick v. State
830 So. 2d 248 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
944 So. 2d 1042, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 13230, 2006 WL 2265400, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reaves-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.