Reaves v. South Carolina Democratic Party

122 F. App'x 83
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 3, 2005·No. 04-2258·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Reverend Franklin C. Reaves appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment to defendants and dismissing his complaint * in which he alleged violations of the Fifteenth Amendment of the Constitution, as applied through the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. §§ 1971, 1973, 1973c (2000)), and the Due Process Clause and Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Glover v. South Carolina Democratic Party, No. CA-04-2171-4-25 (D.S.C. Sept. 3, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

*

Five other plaintiffs were named in the complaint. Rev. Reaves is the only plaintiff who appeals.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reaves v. South Carolina Democratic Party, 122 F. App'x 83 (4th Cir. 2005).

122 F. App'x 83 (Reaves v. South Carolina Democratic Party) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

North Carolina State Conference of NAACP v. McCrory
182 F. Supp. 3d 320 (M.D. North Carolina, 2016)