Reaves v. Shinseki

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 6, 2011·No. 10-7606·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7606

FRANK REAVES, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

GENERAL ERIC K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, et al.,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:10-cv-00495-HCM-TEM)

Submitted: March 31, 2011 Decided: April 6, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frank Reaves, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Frank Reaves appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his petition for a writ of mandamus. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Reaves v. Shinseki, No. 2:10-cv-00495-HCM-TEM (E.D. Va. Oct. 8,

2010). We deny Reaves’ motion for appointment of counsel and we

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reaves v. Shinseki, (4th Cir. 2011).

Reaves v. Shinseki (Reaves v. Shinseki) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.