Reaves v. Shinseki
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7606
FRANK REAVES, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GENERAL ERIC K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, et al.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:10-cv-00495-HCM-TEM)
Submitted: March 31, 2011 Decided: April 6, 2011
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Frank Reaves, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Frank Reaves appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his petition for a writ of mandamus. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Reaves v. Shinseki, No. 2:10-cv-00495-HCM-TEM (E.D. Va. Oct. 8,
2010). We deny Reaves’ motion for appointment of counsel and we
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Reaves v. Shinseki (Reaves v. Shinseki) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.