Reaves v. Reaves

CourtCourt of Appeals of South Carolina
DecidedApril 27, 2009
Docket2009-UP-172
StatusUnpublished

This text of Reaves v. Reaves (Reaves v. Reaves) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reaves v. Reaves, (S.C. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

Willie D. Reaves, Respondent,

v.

Franklin Reaves, Appellant.


Appeal From Marion County
William Young, Family Court Judge


Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-172
Submitted April 1, 2009 – Filed April 27, 2009  


AFFIRMED


Franklin C. Reaves, pro se Appellant.

Willie D. Reaves, pro se Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Franklin Reeves appeals from the family court’s order finding him in contempt for his willful violation of the court’s prior order to pay alimony to Willie Reaves.  We affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: S.C Code Ann. § 63-3-620 (Supp. 2008) (“An adult who willfully violates, neglects, or refuses to obey or perform a lawful order of the court . . . may be proceeded against for contempt of court.”); Frye v. Frye, 323 S.C. 72, 75-76, 448 S.E.2d 586, 588 (Ct. App. 1994) (citing Jordan v. Harrison, 303 S.C. 522, 402 S.E.2d 188 (Ct. App. 1991)) (“[W]here one held in contempt for violation of a court order complies with the order, his compliance renders the issue of contempt moot and precludes appellate review of the contempt proceeding.”).

AFFIRMED. [1]

Huff, Williams, and Konduros, JJ., concur.


[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Frye v. Frye
448 S.E.2d 586 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1994)
Jordan v. Harrison
402 S.E.2d 188 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Reaves v. Reaves, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reaves-v-reaves-scctapp-2009.