Reaves v. Oliver

168 U.S. 704, 18 S. Ct. 945, 42 L. Ed. 1212, 1897 U.S. LEXIS 1756
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 1, 1897·No. No. 60·Published·Cited by 17 cases

Opinion

Per Cuodam.

The order or decree sought to be reviewed was not final but interlocutory, and the writ of error and the appeal must be dismissed. Acts September 24,1789, c. 20, '§§ 13, 22,1 Stat. 81, 84; March 3, 1803, c. 40, 2 Stat.- 244; Rev. Stat. §§ 691, 692; Act March 3, 1891, c. 517, 26 Stat. 826; Forgay v. Conrad, 6 How. 201, 205 ; McLish v. Roff, 141 U. S. 661; American Construction Co. v. Jacksonville, Tampa &c. Railway, 148 [705]*705U. S. 372, 378; Smith v. Vulcan Iron Works, 165 U. S. 518, 521.

Mr. Frank B. Crosthwaiie for plaintiff in error and appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reaves v. Oliver, 168 U.S. 704, 18 S. Ct. 945, 42 L. Ed. 1212, 1897 U.S. LEXIS 1756 (1897).

168 U.S. 704 (Reaves v. Oliver) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Danielewicz v. Arnold
769 A.2d 274 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 2001)
Citibank, N.A. v. Data Lease Financial Corp.
828 F.2d 686 (Eleventh Circuit, 1987)
Stirling v. Chemical Bank
382 F. Supp. 1146 (S.D. New York, 1974)
Johnson v. American General Insurance Co.
296 F. Supp. 802 (District of Columbia, 1969)
Mullins v. First National Exchange Bank of Virginia
275 F. Supp. 712 (W.D. Virginia, 1967)
Telesphore Couture v. Watkins
162 F. Supp. 727 (E.D. New York, 1958)
Hunter-Wilson Distilling Co. v. Foust Distilling Co.
84 F. Supp. 996 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1949)
Waller v. Waller
49 A.2d 449 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1946)
Liken v. Shaffer
64 F. Supp. 432 (N.D. Iowa, 1946)
Lesnik v. Public Industrials Corporation
144 F.2d 968 (Second Circuit, 1944)