Reaves v. Claim Regional Office Fiduciary

454 F. App'x 217
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 18, 2011·No. No. 11-6964·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Larry D. Reaves appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for failure to state a claim. Reaves’ opening appellate brief is incoherent and fails to conform to any of the requirements of Fourth Circuit Local Rule 34(b). By failing to raise any issues for appeal, Reaves has abandoned all appellate claims. See, e.g., Edwards v. City of Goldsboro, 178 F.3d 231, 241 n. 6 (4th Cir.1999). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reaves v. Claim Regional Office Fiduciary, 454 F. App'x 217 (4th Cir. 2011).

454 F. App'x 217 (Reaves v. Claim Regional Office Fiduciary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Edwards v. City of Goldsboro
178 F.3d 231 (Fourth Circuit, 1999)