Reaves v. Claim Regional Office Fiduciary
This text of 454 F. App'x 217 (Reaves v. Claim Regional Office Fiduciary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Larry D. Reaves appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for failure to state a claim. Reaves’ opening appellate brief is incoherent and fails to conform to any of the requirements of Fourth Circuit Local Rule 34(b). By failing to raise any issues for appeal, Reaves has abandoned all appellate claims. See, e.g., Edwards v. City of Goldsboro, 178 F.3d 231, 241 n. 6 (4th Cir.1999). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
454 F. App'x 217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reaves-v-claim-regional-office-fiduciary-ca4-2011.