Reaves v. Abdullah
This text of 197 A.D.2d 911 (Reaves v. Abdullah) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: In his answer to the paternity petition, respondent requested that Family Court review his criminal conviction and direct Auburn Correctional Facility, where he is incarcerated, to permit his participation in a visitation program. That relief was properly denied. Family Court has no jurisdiction to consider criminal matters (see, People v Rogers, 248 App Div 141, affd 272 NY 612; see also, Family Ct Act § 115) nor to entertain proceedings to compel an act by a prison official (see, CPLR 7804 [b]). (Appeal from Order of Monroe County Family Court, Miller, J.—Visitation.) Present—Green, J. P., Balio, Fallon, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
197 A.D.2d 911, 603 N.Y.S.2d 788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reaves-v-abdullah-nyappdiv-1993.