Reatz v. New York

Supreme Court

Reatz v. New York

375 U.S. 16, 11 L. Ed. 2d 43, 84 S. Ct. 87, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 523

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedOctober 14, 1963

DocketNo. 50

StatusPublished

This text of 375 U.S. 16 (Reatz v. New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reatz v. New York, 375 U.S. 16, 11 L. Ed. 2d 43, 84 S. Ct. 87, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 523 (1963).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department, for further consideration in light of Griffin v. Illinois, 351 U. S. 12, Eskridge v. Washington Prison Board, 357 U. S. 214, and Norvell v. Illinois, 373 U. S. 420.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department, for further consideration in light of Griffin v. Illinois, 351 U. S. 12, Eskridge v. Washington Prison Board, 357 U. S. 214, and Norvell v. Illinois, 373 U. S. 420.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

375 U.S. 16, 11 L. Ed. 2d 43, 84 S. Ct. 87, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 523, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reatz-v-new-york-scotus-1963.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack