Reasonable Homes Corp. v. Goodman

180 N.E.2d 818, 343 Mass. 780
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided March 12, 1962·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Exceptions overruled. In this action of tort for conversion of a prefabricated steel plate, there was a verdict for the defendants (Benjamin Goodman, Nauriek A. Goodman, and Harry A. Goodman). The plaintiff’s exceptions are to the denial of three motions for a new trial: (1) on the ground that the verdict was against the evidence and the weight of the evidence; (2) on the ground of newly discovered evidence; and (3) on the ground of improper conduct on the part of the defendants’ counsel. The exceptions presented no questions of law. The allowance of the motions was discretionary with the judge. Hathaway v. Checker Taxi Co. 321 Mass. 406, 412. Duarte v. Kavanagh, 340 Mass. 640, 642. F. P. Battery Research Corp. v. Major Mach. Corp. 342 Mass. 780, and eases cited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reasonable Homes Corp. v. Goodman, 180 N.E.2d 818, 343 Mass. 780 (Mass. 1962).

180 N.E.2d 818 (Reasonable Homes Corp. v. Goodman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

John J. Williams Insurance Agency Inc. v. Putignano
36 Mass. App. Dec. 135 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1967)
Dumais v. Laino
25 Mass. App. Dec. 100 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1962)