Reason v. Becker

Superior Court of Rhode Island

Reason v. Becker

4 R.I. Dec. 120

Superior Court of Rhode Island·Decided March 30, 1928·No. No. 59103; No. 59104·Published

Opinion

BLODGETT, J.

Heard upon motion for new trial filed by defendant after a verdict for Mary Reason for $1500 and for Isaac Reason for $500.

The plaintiff Mary Reason on November 4, 1923, was attempting to board an electric car at a white post at the corner of Mantón Avenue and Julian Street and was struck by an automobile driven by the defendant.

The evidence abundantly justified [121]*121the verdict and the damages are not excessive.

For Plaintiffs: William S. Flynn and Edmund W. Flynn. For Defendant: Cooney & Cooney.

The plaintiff Isaac Reason sued for loss of his wife’s services and expenses incurred by reason of the accident and the damages are not excessive.

Motions denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BLODGETT, J.

Heard upon motion for new trial filed by defendant after a verdict for Mary Reason for $1500 and for Isaac Reason for $500.

The plaintiff Mary Reason on November 4, 1923, was attempting to board an electric car at a white post at the corner of Mantón Avenue and Julian Street and was struck by an automobile driven by the defendant.

The evidence abundantly justified [121]*121the verdict and the damages are not excessive.

For Plaintiffs: William S. Flynn and Edmund W. Flynn. For Defendant: Cooney & Cooney.

The plaintiff Isaac Reason sued for loss of his wife’s services and expenses incurred by reason of the accident and the damages are not excessive.

Motions denied.

Reason v. Becker, 4 R.I. Dec. 120 (R.I. Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

4 R.I. Dec. 120 (Reason v. Becker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.