Reason v. Becker

Superior Court of Rhode Island

Reason v. Becker

4 R.I. Dec. 120

CourtSuperior Court of Rhode Island

DecidedMarch 30, 1928

DocketNo. 59103; No. 59104

StatusPublished

This text of 4 R.I. Dec. 120 (Reason v. Becker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reason v. Becker, 4 R.I. Dec. 120 (R.I. Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

BLODGETT, J.

Heard upon motion for new trial filed by defendant after a verdict for Mary Reason for $1500 and for Isaac Reason for $500.

The plaintiff Mary Reason on November 4, 1923, was attempting to board an electric car at a white post at the corner of Mantón Avenue and Julian Street and was struck by an automobile driven by the defendant.

The evidence abundantly justified [121]*121the verdict and the damages are not excessive.

For Plaintiffs: William S. Flynn and Edmund W. Flynn. For Defendant: Cooney & Cooney.

The plaintiff Isaac Reason sued for loss of his wife’s services and expenses incurred by reason of the accident and the damages are not excessive.

Motions denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI