Reardon v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Reardon v. State

806 So. 2d 446, 27 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 48, 2002 Fla. LEXIS 2, 2002 WL 5489

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 3, 2002·No. No. SC00-1395·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted review of the decision in State v. Reardon, 763 So.2d 418 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000), based on alleged express and direct conflict with Thompson v. State, 650 So.2d 969 (Fla.1994), Goodwin v. State, 634 So.2d 157 (Fla.1994), and Sirmons v. State, 634 So.2d 153 (Fla.1994). Upon further consideration, we find that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted review of the decision in State v. Reardon, 763 So.2d 418 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000), based on alleged express and direct conflict with Thompson v. State, 650 So.2d 969 (Fla.1994), Goodwin v. State, 634 So.2d 157 (Fla.1994), and Sirmons v. State, 634 So.2d 153 (Fla.1994). Upon further consideration, we find that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

Reardon v. State, 806 So. 2d 446, 27 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 48, 2002 Fla. LEXIS 2, 2002 WL 5489 (Fla. 2002).

Pincite

806 So. 2d 446 (Reardon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related