Reardon v. Reardon

355 So. 2d 207, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15321
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 22, 1978
DocketNo. GG-496
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 355 So. 2d 207 (Reardon v. Reardon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reardon v. Reardon, 355 So. 2d 207, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15321 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The husband appeals the final judgment awarding the wife rehabilitative alimony and attorney fees. We find the trial judge erred in awarding attorney fees since the wife made no request for such fees in her pleading. Johnson v. Johnson, 346 So.2d 591 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977).

We also find error in the trial judge’s award of rehabilitative alimony. The wife did not appear at the final hearing and failed to present any testimony whatsoever concerning her needs. Any award of alimony of course must be based on the spouse’s needs and the other’s ability to pay. Sisson v. Sisson, 336 So.2d 1129 (Fla. 1976). The awards of rehabilitative alimony and attorney fees are therefore

REVERSED.

BOYER, Acting C. J., and MILLS and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Berlin v. Berlin
395 So. 2d 1260 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Buchman v. Buchman
382 So. 2d 1337 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
McCallum v. McCallum
364 So. 2d 97 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
355 So. 2d 207, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reardon-v-reardon-fladistctapp-1978.