Reardon v. Olympic Theatre Corp.

231 A.D. 875
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 15, 1930
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 231 A.D. 875 (Reardon v. Olympic Theatre Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reardon v. Olympic Theatre Corp., 231 A.D. 875 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellants to abide the event on the ground that prejudicial errors occurred: 1. In the refusal to charge the final request of defendant. (New York Life Insurance Company v. Casey, 178 N. Y. 381.) (See Germania Life Insurance Company v. Casey, 98 App. Div. 88; affd., 184 N. Y. 554.) 2. In the refusal to leave to the jury the question of the sufficiency of the notice of dishonor. (Latham v. Sheff, 193 App. Div. 576; Union Bank v. Deshel, 139 id. 217.) (See Cuming v. Roderick, 28 id. 253; affd., 167 N. Y. 571.) All concur. Present — Sears, P. J., Crouch, Edgeomb, Thompson and Crosby, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Trusts & Guarantee Co. v. Barnhardt
1 N.E.2d 459 (New York Court of Appeals, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
231 A.D. 875, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reardon-v-olympic-theatre-corp-nyappdiv-1930.