Reap v. Battle

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Reap v. Battle

26 A. 439, 155 Pa. 265, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1237

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 1, 1893·No. Appeal, No. 40·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Everything that is necessary to a proper understanding of the questions presented by the specifications of error, or that can be profitably said in relation thereto, will be found in the clear and able opinion of the learned president of the common pleas discharging the rule to show eause why the judgment should not be opened, etc.

For reasons there given at length the order discharging the rule is affirmed with costs to be paid by appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

Everything that is necessary to a proper understanding of the questions presented by the specifications of error, or that can be profitably said in relation thereto, will be found in the clear and able opinion of the learned president of the common pleas discharging the rule to show eause why the judgment should not be opened, etc.

For reasons there given at length the order discharging the rule is affirmed with costs to be paid by appellant.

Reap v. Battle, 26 A. 439, 155 Pa. 265, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1237 (Pa. 1893).

Pincite

26 A. 439 (Reap v. Battle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related