Reamy v. State

848 So. 2d 1196, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 9387, 2003 WL 21459644
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 25, 2003·No. No. 3D03-1201·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

David Reamy appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm.

Defendant-appellant Reamy filed his motion in Miami-Dade County Circuit Court case number 95-35612. In the motion, the defendant asserts that he was not advised of the possible immigration consequences of his plea, and that deportation [1197] proceedings have been initiated against him.

The defendant is not entitled to relief. The order to show cause issued by the United States Immigration and Naturalization Services (“INS”) cites several other convictions of the defendant, but not the 1995 case, as a basis for deportation. That being so, we affirm the denial of postcon-viction relief on authority of Prieto v. State, 824 So.2d 924 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) review denied, 842 So.2d 845 (Fla.2003).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reamy v. State, 848 So. 2d 1196, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 9387, 2003 WL 21459644 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

848 So. 2d 1196 (Reamy v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Prieto v. State
824 So. 2d 924 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)