Reamy v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Reamy v. State

848 So. 2d 1196, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 9387, 2003 WL 21459644

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 25, 2003

DocketNo. 3D03-1201

StatusPublished

This text of 848 So. 2d 1196 (Reamy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reamy v. State, 848 So. 2d 1196, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 9387, 2003 WL 21459644 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

David Reamy appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm.

Defendant-appellant Reamy filed his motion in Miami-Dade County Circuit Court case number 95-35612. In the motion, the defendant asserts that he was not advised of the possible immigration consequences of his plea, and that deportation [1197]*1197proceedings have been initiated against him.

The defendant is not entitled to relief. The order to show cause issued by the United States Immigration and Naturalization Services (“INS”) cites several other convictions of the defendant, but not the 1995 case, as a basis for deportation. That being so, we affirm the denial of postcon-viction relief on authority of Prieto v. State, 824 So.2d 924 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) review denied, 842 So.2d 845 (Fla.2003).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI