Reams v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Reams v. State

541 S.W.3d 53

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 6, 2018

DocketWD 80249

StatusPublished

This text of 541 S.W.3d 53 (Reams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reams v. State, 541 S.W.3d 53 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam

Shawn Reams appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Reams contends his plea counsel was ineffective for refusing to take the case to trial and insisting that Reams plead guilty. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would have no precedential value.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam

Shawn Reams appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Reams contends his plea counsel was ineffective for refusing to take the case to trial and insisting that Reams plead guilty. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would have no precedential value.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

541 S.W.3d 53, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reams-v-state-moctapp-2018.