Reams v. . Hight

161 S.E. 484, 201 N.C. 797, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 103
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedDecember 16, 1931
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 161 S.E. 484 (Reams v. . Hight) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reams v. . Hight, 161 S.E. 484, 201 N.C. 797, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 103 (N.C. 1931).

Opinion

Civil action for an accounting and to restrain the defendants from foreclosing deed of trust.

A reference was ordered and the matter heard by Hon. A. W. Graham, Jr., Who found the facts and reported the same, together with his conclusions of law, to the court.

Upon exceptions duly filed and issues tendered, the matter came on for hearing at the March Term, 1931, Vance Superior Court, When it was agreed by counsel "that the court might hear the argument in the case, and then directed the jury as a matter of law," which was done.

The court's directions or instructions to the jury are based upon the evidence, none of which is incorporated in the record on appeal.

From a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff, the defendant, W. C. Hight, appeals, assigning errors. In the absence of the evidence taken before the referee, and upon which the judge of the Superior Court based his rulings, we cannot say that there was error in the trial. It is not contended that the evidence is insufficient to support the findings and the verdict. The presumption is otherwise.

Affirmed. *Page 798

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

New Hanover County v. Burton
310 S.E.2d 72 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
161 S.E. 484, 201 N.C. 797, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reams-v-hight-nc-1931.