Reams v. Hight

201 N.C. 797
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided December 16, 1931·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

In the absence of the evidence taken before the referee, and upon which the judge of the Superior Court based his rulings, we cannot say that there was error in the trial. It is not contended that the evidence is insufficient to support the findings and the verdict. The presumption is otherwise.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reams v. Hight, 201 N.C. 797 (N.C. 1931).

201 N.C. 797 (Reams v. Hight) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

New Hanover County v. Burton
310 S.E.2d 72 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1983)