Reamer Industries, Inc. v. McQuay, Inc.
This text of 462 F.2d 1372 (Reamer Industries, Inc. v. McQuay, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This diversity action was instituted by Reamer Industries, Inc., against Me- *1373 Quay, Inc., for indemnification for monies which the plaintiff paid to a general contracting firm for repairs of fire damages to the Orangeburg-Calhoun Technical Education Center allegedly caused by defective fan coil heating and air conditioning equipment manufactured by McQuay.
The case was tried by the court without a jury and plaintiff was awarded judgment. Appellee, Reamer, has filed its motion for summary affirmance on the ground that “the appeal does not present any substantial questions of law or fact.”
Upon consideration of the record, the briefs, appellee’s motion for affirmance and appellant’s response thereto, we have dispensed with oral argument and now affirm on the opinion of the district court. 1
Affirmed.
. Reamer Industries, Inc. v. McQuay, Inc., 344 F.Supp. 540 (D.C.S.C.1971).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
462 F.2d 1372, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reamer-industries-inc-v-mcquay-inc-ca4-1972.