Ream v. Ream

24 N.E.2d 96, 281 N.Y. 395, 1939 N.Y. LEXIS 1023
New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 15, 1939·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant Bethel Veech Ream, having given notice to the court that he has attained the age of twenty-one years, is entitled to appear upon the appeal by attorneys of his own selection. Sherman & Goldring, having filed a notice of appearance for the defendant, may appear in his behalf upon the argument of the appeal and will then be free to state the position which the defendant desires to take upon the appeal.

The motion to dismiss the appeal should be granted to the extent indicated in this opinion; otherwise denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ream v. Ream, 24 N.E.2d 96, 281 N.Y. 395, 1939 N.Y. LEXIS 1023 (N.Y. 1939).

24 N.E.2d 96 (Ream v. Ream) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

O'Leary v. Brown Seal Realty Corp.
33 A.D.2d 764 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1969)
Tenney v. Rosenthal
160 N.E.2d 463 (New York Court of Appeals, 1959)