Ream v. Marker
This text of Ream v. Marker (Ream v. Marker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nebraska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
REBECCA REAM and JUSTIN REAM, as co-guardians for CHRIS BINGHAM, 8:21-CV-288
Plaintiffs, ORDER vs.
BRITTANY MARKER, RN, in her individual capacity,
Defendant.
This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's findings and recommendation (filing 36) recommending that the Court dismiss this case without prejudice for failing to comply with discovery orders. Involuntary dismissal for failing to follow discovery rules, comply with the Court's orders, or failure to prosecute is within the Court's discretion. Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b)(2)(A)(v); Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); see Keefer v. Provident Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 238 F.3d 937, 940 (8th Cir. 2000); Schooley v. Kennedy, 712 F.2d 372, 373-74 (8th Cir. 1983). And there has been no objection to the findings and recommendation, meaning that the plaintiffs have waived their right to de novo review. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); NECivR 72.2; United States v. Wise, 588 F.3d 531, 537 n.5 (8th Cir. 2009). Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED: 1. The Magistrate Judge's findings and recommendation (filing 36) are adopted. 2. This case is dismissed without prejudice.
3. A separate judgment will be entered.
Dated this 20th day of January, 2028.
BY THE COURT: bin We touraal OMAP john M.’Gerrard United States District Judge
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ream v. Marker, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ream-v-marker-ned-2023.