Realty Holding Corp. v. Noggle

121 So. 883, 97 Fla. 643
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided April 25, 1929·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it is considered by the Court that the judgment should be reversed on authority of the opinion in the ease of J. N. Ackley, plain *644 tiff in error, v. H. W. Noggle et al, defendants in error, decided at this term of the Court and it is so ordered.

Reversed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur. Terrell, C. J., and Ellis and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Realty Holding Corp. v. Noggle, 121 So. 883, 97 Fla. 643 (Fla. 1929).

121 So. 883 (Realty Holding Corp. v. Noggle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Luria v. Bank of Coral Gables
142 So. 901 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1932)
Sumner Et Vir. v. Osborne
135 So. 513 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)
McCurdy's Estate
154 A. 707 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1931)
Whitfield v. Webb
131 So. 786 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)
American Surety Co. v. Smith
130 So. 440 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)