Realty Associates Securities Corp. v. Jaybar Realty Corp.

257 A.D. 1001, 13 N.Y.S.2d 881, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8877
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 27, 1939
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 257 A.D. 1001 (Realty Associates Securities Corp. v. Jaybar Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Realty Associates Securities Corp. v. Jaybar Realty Corp., 257 A.D. 1001, 13 N.Y.S.2d 881, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8877 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Opinion

— -Order confirming report of referee in foreclosure and reports of an official referee in surplus money proceedings, in so far as appealed from, modified by striking therefrom the sum of seventy-five dollars directed to be paid to' Benjamin L. Sandberg, Esq., and substituting in lieu thereof the sum of twenty dollars, and by striking therefrom the sum of $540 directed to be paid to M. W., Inc., and substituting in lieu thereof the sum of $225, and, as so modified, affirmed, with costs payable by appellants to respondent Louis Kreger, and otherwise without costs. Rule 262 of the Rules of Civil Practice prohibits an allowance to counsel in surplus money proceedings. (Reilly v. Empire State Improvement Corp., 251 N. Y. 351, 353.) In view of the stipulation of the parties, the sum of $540 must be accepted as the unpaid balance at the time of the filing of a notice of lien. As the surplus moneys were derived from the sale of but five of twelve houses, as against which it was admitted the claim was applicable and the lien applied, respondent M. W., Inc., [1002]*1002is entitled to a proportionate sum of $225. The amounts received by way of releases by M. W,, Ine., partly or wholly for extras, are immaterial so long as that respondent receives but its allocated share from the proceeds derived from the houses in question, and has not been overpaid. It is clear that the mortgage of the appellants was subordinate to that of respondent Kreger. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sadow v. Poskin Realty Corp.
63 Misc. 2d 499 (New York Supreme Court, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
257 A.D. 1001, 13 N.Y.S.2d 881, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8877, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/realty-associates-securities-corp-v-jaybar-realty-corp-nyappdiv-1939.