Real v. Superintendent , Massachusetts Correctional Institution

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Real v. Superintendent , Massachusetts Correctional Institution

482 N.E.2d 1188, 396 Mass. 1001, 1985 Mass. LEXIS 1752

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedSeptember 25, 1985

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 482 N.E.2d 1188 (Real v. Superintendent , Massachusetts Correctional Institution) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Real v. Superintendent , Massachusetts Correctional Institution, 482 N.E.2d 1188, 396 Mass. 1001, 1985 Mass. LEXIS 1752 (Mass. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

The Supreme Court of the United States, having vacated the judgment of this court and having remanded the case to this court for further proceedings not inconsistent with its opinion (Ponte v. Real, 471 U.S. 491 [1985]), and the defendant superintendent having admitted to this court that, if given the opportunity, he could not demonstrate the reasons why the plaintiff’s witnesses were not called at his disciplinary hearing, the judgments are reversed and the case is remanded for entry of judgment declaring the rights of the plaintiff and ordering relief consistent with the principles set forth in the opinion of this court in this case (see 390 Mass. 399, 408 [1983]), with the defendant having, on request, the right to conduct a new hearing as stated in the opinion.

So ordered.

The case was considered on submissions by counsel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Supreme Court of the United States, having vacated the judgment of this court and having remanded the case to this court for further proceedings not inconsistent with its opinion (Ponte v. Real, 471 U.S. 491 [1985]), and the defendant superintendent having admitted to this court that, if given the opportunity, he could not demonstrate the reasons why the plaintiff’s witnesses were not called at his disciplinary hearing, the judgments are reversed and the case is remanded for entry of judgment declaring the rights of the plaintiff and ordering relief consistent with the principles set forth in the opinion of this court in this case (see 390 Mass. 399, 408 [1983]), with the defendant having, on request, the right to conduct a new hearing as stated in the opinion.

So ordered.

The case was considered on submissions by counsel.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

482 N.E.2d 1188, 396 Mass. 1001, 1985 Mass. LEXIS 1752, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/real-v-superintendent-massachusetts-correctional-institution-mass-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack