Real Investments, LLC v. Oaks Group, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Real Investments, LLC v. Oaks Group, Inc.

922 So. 2d 403, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 3298, 2006 WL 544492

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 8, 2006

DocketNo. 4D05-3298

StatusPublished

This text of 922 So. 2d 403 (Real Investments, LLC v. Oaks Group, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Real Investments, LLC v. Oaks Group, Inc., 922 So. 2d 403, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 3298, 2006 WL 544492 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Real Investments, LLC petitions for a writ of certiorari to review an order dissolving a lis pendens. The lis pendens was dissolved after petitioner failed to post a $2.9 million bond. We agree with Real Investments that it was improper for the trial court to set the bond amount without conducting an evidentiary hearing. S & T Builders v. Globe Props., Inc., 909 So.2d 375 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005).

We grant the petition for certiorari and temporarily reinstate the lis pendens pending the evidentiary hearing. The trial court is directed to conduct the evidentiary hearing within 30 days of this court’s mandate. In setting the bond, “[t]he amount should bear a reasonable relationship to the amount of damages which the property-holder defendant demonstrates will likely result if it is later determined that the notice of lis pendens was unjustified.” Med Facilities Dev. v. Little Arch Creek, 675 So.2d 915, 918 n. 2 (Fla.1996). If the evidence supports it, the trial court can again order petitioner to post a $2.9 million bond.

GUNTHER, POLEN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Real Investments, LLC petitions for a writ of certiorari to review an order dissolving a lis pendens. The lis pendens was dissolved after petitioner failed to post a $2.9 million bond. We agree with Real Investments that it was improper for the trial court to set the bond amount without conducting an evidentiary hearing. S & T Builders v. Globe Props., Inc., 909 So.2d 375 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005).

We grant the petition for certiorari and temporarily reinstate the lis pendens pending the evidentiary hearing. The trial court is directed to conduct the evidentiary hearing within 30 days of this court’s mandate. In setting the bond, “[t]he amount should bear a reasonable relationship to the amount of damages which the property-holder defendant demonstrates will likely result if it is later determined that the notice of lis pendens was unjustified.” Med Facilities Dev. v. Little Arch Creek, 675 So.2d 915, 918 n. 2 (Fla.1996). If the evidence supports it, the trial court can again order petitioner to post a $2.9 million bond.

GUNTHER, POLEN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

922 So. 2d 403, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 3298, 2006 WL 544492, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/real-investments-llc-v-oaks-group-inc-fladistctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack