Reagan v. State

667 So. 2d 378, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12673, 1995 WL 700376
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 29, 1995
DocketNo. 95-105
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 667 So. 2d 378 (Reagan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reagan v. State, 667 So. 2d 378, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12673, 1995 WL 700376 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court’s denial of the motion to suppress. The trial court found that the initial stop was illegal, and we find that there were no legally sufficient intervening circumstances which would result in the ultimate search not being considered fruits of the poisonous tree. See Libby v. State, 561 So.2d 1253 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Kimbrough v. State, 539 So.2d 619 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); and Rozier v. State, 368 So.2d 379 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). The judgment below is reversed, and the case remanded with directions to grant the motion to suppress.

WOLF, LAWRENCE and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Frierson
926 So. 2d 1139 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2006)
Bennett v. Ward
667 So. 2d 378 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
667 So. 2d 378, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12673, 1995 WL 700376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reagan-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.