Reagan v. State
This text of 667 So. 2d 378 (Reagan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We reverse the trial court’s denial of the motion to suppress. The trial court found that the initial stop was illegal, and we find that there were no legally sufficient intervening circumstances which would result in the ultimate search not being considered fruits of the poisonous tree. See Libby v. State, 561 So.2d 1253 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Kimbrough v. State, 539 So.2d 619 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); and Rozier v. State, 368 So.2d 379 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). The judgment below is reversed, and the case remanded with directions to grant the motion to suppress.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
667 So. 2d 378, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12673, 1995 WL 700376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reagan-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.