Reagan v. Malone

CourtCourt of Appeals of Tennessee
DecidedNovember 23, 1998
Docket03A01-9805-CH-00173
StatusPublished

This text of Reagan v. Malone (Reagan v. Malone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reagan v. Malone, (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS AT KNOXVILLE FILED November 23, 1998

Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate Court Clerk C. M. REAGAN ) HAMILTON COUNTY ) 03A01-9805-CH-00173 Plaintiff-Appellee ) ) ) v. ) ) HON. R. VANN OWENS, ) CHANCELLOR TROY MALONE, SANDRA MALONE ) and DAN CONNELLY ) ) AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED Defendants-Appellants ) and REMANDED

MARVIN BERKE OF CHATTANOOGA FOR APPELLANT DAN CONNELLY

SCOTT N. BROWN, JR., and SCOTT A. MILLER OF CHATTANOOGA FOR APPELLEE

OPINION

Goddard, P.J.

This is an appeal by Dan Connelly from an order entered by the Chancellor

pursuant to a motion by C. M. Reagan, seeking to discover assets of Mr. Connelly for the

purpose of satisfying a judgment rendered in Mr. Reagan’s favor.

Because the Chancellor was of the opinion that Mr. Connelly was not honoring

previous orders to produce documents, he entered an order (see appendix), which is the subject of

this appeal. During oral argument in this Court, counsel for Mr. Reagan conceded that he had

received all the necessary information addressed by the Chancellor’s order, except the bank

records from the Northwest Georgia Bank.

Counsel for Mr. Connelly conceded that he and his client would have no objection

to counsel for Mr. Reagan examining the Georgia bank records provided counsel for Mr.

Connelly could be present when they were examined.

In light of the concessions on both sides, the Court vacates the order previously

entered by the Chancellor, except that part of the order relating to the Georgia Bank, which will

remain in full force and effect, provided counsel for Mr. Connelly has the opportunity to be

present when any bank records are examined.

For the foregoing reasons the judgment of the Trial Court, as modified, is

affirmed and the cause remanded for such proceedings, if any, as may be necessary and

collection of costs below. Costs of appeal, as are costs below, are adjudged one-half against Mr.

Reagan and one-half against Mr. Connelly.

_______________________________ Houston M. Goddard, P.J.

CONCUR:

________________________________ Herschel P. Franks, J.

2 (Not Participating) Don T. McMurray, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Reagan v. Malone, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reagan-v-malone-tennctapp-1998.