Reagan National Advertising of Austin, Inc. v. City of Austin and Greg Guernsey, in His Official Capacity as Director of Planning and Development Review
This text of Reagan National Advertising of Austin, Inc. v. City of Austin and Greg Guernsey, in His Official Capacity as Director of Planning and Development Review (Reagan National Advertising of Austin, Inc. v. City of Austin and Greg Guernsey, in His Official Capacity as Director of Planning and Development Review) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ACCEPTED 07-15-00028-CV SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS AMARILLO, TEXAS 2/26/2015 9:28:11 AM Vivian Long, Clerk
NO. 07-15-00028-CV ________________________________________________________________________ FILED IN IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 7th COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AMARILLO, TEXAS POTTER COUNTY, AMARILLO, TEXAS 2/26/2015 9:28:11 AM VIVIAN LONG ________________________________________________________________________ CLERK
REAGAN NATIONAL ADVERTISING OF AUSTIN, INC., APPELLANT
VS.
THE CITY OF AUSTIN AND GREG GUERNSEY, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, APPELLEES ________________________________________________________________________
ON APPEAL FROM th THE 250 JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS CAUSE NO. D-1-GN-13-002477 ________________________________________________________________________
APPELLANT’S UNOPPOSED FIRST MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME ________________________________________________________________________
Appellant Reagan National Advertising of Austin files this motion, which is
unopposed, seeking a 30-day extension of the deadline for its Appellant’s Brief.
1. The deadline for Appellant’s Brief is currently Wednesday, March 4, 2015.
2. Appellant requests a 30-day extension until Friday, April 3, 2015. This is
Appellant’s first request for an extension.
3. The additional time is sought due to recent and unexpected demands on
counsel’s time in other matters, the deadlines for which could not be extended by
agreement.
4. Appellees do not oppose the relief requested in this motion.
1 5. This extension is not sought for delay, but so that justice may be done.
For these reasons, Appellant prays that the Court grant an extension of its deadline
to file the Appellant’s Brief until April 3, 2015.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ B. Russell Horton B. Russell Horton State Bar No. 10014450 rhorton@gbkh.com George Brothers Kincaid & Horton, L.L.P. 114 West 7th Street, Suite 1100 Austin, Texas 78701 (512) 495-1400 (512) 499-0094 FACSIMILE ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT
CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
I spoke with Chris Coppola on February 25, 2015. He indicated that Appellees do not oppose relief requested in this motion.
/s/ B. Russell Horton B. Russell Horton
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that a copy of this brief was served on February 26, 2015, on the following by email and through the court’s e-filing system:
Karen M. Kennard Meghan L. Riley Christopher Coppola City of Austin-Law Department PO Box 1546 Austin, TX 78767-1546 512-974-1311 (facsimile) Christopher.coppola@austintexas.gov
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Reagan National Advertising of Austin, Inc. v. City of Austin and Greg Guernsey, in His Official Capacity as Director of Planning and Development Review, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reagan-national-advertising-of-austin-inc-v-city-of-austin-and-greg-tex-2015.