Ready State Bank v. Meiselman
This text of 741 So. 2d 1215 (Ready State Bank v. Meiselman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Ready State Bank held a mortgage on a long-term leasehold granted to the Appels, the tenants, by the fee-owner landlord, Meiselman. Because of numerous defaults, the lease was canceled below in a ruling about which the bank does not complain. It does contend, however, in a case number 98-2201, that the trial court erred in failing to grant its application to succeed to the contractual rights of the tenants under a so called “pickup” lease, see 1 [1216]*1216Milton R. Friedman, Friedman on Leases § 7.801, at 451 (4th ed. 1997), as provided by the parties’ mutual agreement.1 We disagree and affirm simply because there is ample evidence to support the conclusion that the “Lender,” Ready, did not, as required, “[diligently pursue] ... the cure of any default under the Lease that [it was] reasonably capable of curing.” In this state of the record we cannot, of course, interfere with the decision below. Westerman v. Shell’s City, Inc., 265 So.2d 43 (Fla.1972); Home Ins. Co. v. Mendelson, 367 So.2d 1071 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).
Meiselman separately argues in case number 99-164 that the expenses of the receivership imposed on the leasehold should have been taxed as cost against the bank. We find no error in this ruling. D.S. Ware Co. v. Green, 696 So.2d 959 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997); Barredo v. Skyfreight, Inc., 430 So.2d 513 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
741 So. 2d 1215, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 12739, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ready-state-bank-v-meiselman-fladistctapp-1999.