Reads v. Rockaway Crossing, LLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Reads v. Rockaway Crossing, LLC

18 A.D.3d 337, 794 N.Y.S.2d 650

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 19, 2005

StatusPublished

This text of 18 A.D.3d 337 (Reads v. Rockaway Crossing, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reads v. Rockaway Crossing, LLC, 18 A.D.3d 337, 794 N.Y.S.2d 650 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Werner Kornreich, J.), entered December 20, 2004, which denied plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Defendant landlord allegedly failed to maintain properly the common areas of the shopping center in which plaintiff has rented space pursuant to the parties’ 20-year lease agreement. The court providently exercised its discretion when it denied a preliminary injunction to this plaintiff, which failed to demonstrate it would be irreparably injured without such relief (Wall St. Garage Parking Corp. v New York Stock Exch., Inc., 10 AD3d 223 [2004]). Moreover, plaintiff has also failed to demonstrate that it lacks an adequate remedy at law (id.). Concur—Saxe, J.P., Marlow, Sullivan, Williams and Gonzalez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Werner Kornreich, J.), entered December 20, 2004, which denied plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Defendant landlord allegedly failed to maintain properly the common areas of the shopping center in which plaintiff has rented space pursuant to the parties’ 20-year lease agreement. The court providently exercised its discretion when it denied a preliminary injunction to this plaintiff, which failed to demonstrate it would be irreparably injured without such relief (Wall St. Garage Parking Corp. v New York Stock Exch., Inc., 10 AD3d 223 [2004]). Moreover, plaintiff has also failed to demonstrate that it lacks an adequate remedy at law (id.). Concur—Saxe, J.P., Marlow, Sullivan, Williams and Gonzalez, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 A.D.3d 337, 794 N.Y.S.2d 650, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reads-v-rockaway-crossing-llc-nyappdiv-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack