Readon v. Lim

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Readon v. Lim

697 So. 2d 178, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7598, 1997 WL 363010

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 2, 1997

DocketNo. 96-678

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 697 So. 2d 178 (Readon v. Lim) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Readon v. Lim, 697 So. 2d 178, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7598, 1997 WL 363010 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this case arising out of an automobile accident, the defendant, Audrey Gillis Rea-don, appeals the trial court’s calculation of damages. We reverse and remand for entry of a judgment consistent with this opinion.

The only damages involved were plaintiffs medical expenses. Without needlessly relating the facts of this case, the judgment is calculated as follows: economic damages ($11,500)- plaintiffs comparative negligence of 30% ($3,450) — personal injury protection benefits ($8,000) ¹= damages for which Rea-don is liable ($50). See Wiggins v. Braman Cadillac, Inc., 669 So.2d 332, 334 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); see also Olson v. N. Cole Constr., Inc., 681 So.2d 799, 800 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).

Reversed and remanded for entry of a judgment consistent with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this case arising out of an automobile accident, the defendant, Audrey Gillis Rea-don, appeals the trial court’s calculation of damages. We reverse and remand for entry of a judgment consistent with this opinion.

The only damages involved were plaintiffs medical expenses. Without needlessly relating the facts of this case, the judgment is calculated as follows: economic damages ($11,500)- plaintiffs comparative negligence of 30% ($3,450) — personal injury protection benefits ($8,000) ¹= damages for which Rea-don is liable ($50). See Wiggins v. Braman Cadillac, Inc., 669 So.2d 332, 334 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); see also Olson v. N. Cole Constr., Inc., 681 So.2d 799, 800 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).

Reversed and remanded for entry of a judgment consistent with this opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

697 So. 2d 178, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7598, 1997 WL 363010, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/readon-v-lim-fladistctapp-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack