Reading v. Holton
3 Ky. 63
This text of 3 Ky. 63 (Reading v. Holton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Reading v. Holton, 3 Ky. 63 (Ky. Ct. App. 1806).
Opinion
In rendering judgment on motion on behalf of a security against his principal, in pursuance of the “ act to empower securities to recover damages in a summary way,” it is not necessary for the record to shew the evidence which the court acted.
But the law does not authorise a judgment for interest accruing subsequent to the paying of the money by the security.-Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 Ky. 63, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reading-v-holton-kyctapp-1806.