Reading Company v. Pope & Talbot, Inc. And Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corporation
This text of 295 F.2d 40 (Reading Company v. Pope & Talbot, Inc. And Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
READING COMPANY, Appellant
v.
POPE & TALBOT, INC. and Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corporation.
No. 13603.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued Oct. 17, 1961.
Decided Oct. 25, 1961.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; C. William Kraft, Jr., Judge.
Harrison G. Kildare, Philadelphia Pa. (Rawle & Henderson, Philadelphia, Pa., Thomas F. Mount, J. Welles Henderson, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.
Elmer C. Maddy, New York City (Krusen, Evans & Shaw, Philadelphia, Pa., and Kirlin, Campbell & Keating, Roy C. Megargel, New York City, Claus G. U. Claesson, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee Pope & Talbot, Inc.
Before KALODNER, HASTIE and GANEY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Upon review of the record we find no error.
The Interlocutory Decree of the District Court of March 30, 1961, 192 F.Supp. 663, will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
295 F.2d 40, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reading-company-v-pope-talbot-inc-and-merritt-chapman-scott-ca3-1961.