Reader v. Ottis

180 N.W. 118, 147 Minn. 466, 1920 Minn. LEXIS 781
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Reader v. Ottis. Read the opinion of the Court — 147 Minn. 335
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided December 10, 1920·No. No. 22,034·Published

Opinion

Peb Cxjbiam.

This is an appeal from an order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, as to the defendants Ottis and La Valle. The action was brought to recover for the. expenses which the plaintiff incurred in caring for his daughter, Grace Reader, on account of the injuries referred to in the decision in Joseph Reader, as the father of Grace Reader, a minor, against these defendants, supra page 335, 180 N. W. 117.

The two cases were brought at the same time, grew out of the same alleged case of negligence, were tried together and submitted to this court upon the same briefs and record and with the same result. All that is said in that case applies here, with the result that the order appealed from is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reader v. Ottis, 180 N.W. 118, 147 Minn. 466, 1920 Minn. LEXIS 781 (Mich. 1920).

180 N.W. 118 (Reader v. Ottis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reader v. Ottis
180 N.W. 117 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1920)