Reade v. Snapper Realty LLC
This text of 24 A.D.3d 262 (Reade v. Snapper Realty LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[263]*263Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.), entered June 10, 2004, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Because plaintiffs failed to raise any material issues of fact in response to the prima facie showing of entitlement to summary judgment made by defendants, the court properly granted summary judgment (Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). In writing a letter to the Department of Buildings objecting to the issuance of building permits to plaintiffs, defendants merely were pursuing their economic interest and did not act at all improperly. Indeed, the Department subsequently agreed with certain objections raised in the letter to plaintiffs’ building plans. Plaintiffs wholly failed to raise a triable issue of fact with respect to its claims that defendants acted tortiously in submitting the letter. We have considered and rejected plaintiffs’ remaining arguments. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Mazzarelli, Ellerin, Catterson and McGuire, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
24 A.D.3d 262, 808 N.Y.S.2d 178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reade-v-snapper-realty-llc-nyappdiv-2005.