Read v. State

78 S.E. 1023, 13 Ga. App. 170, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 88
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedAugust 11, 1913
Docket5045
StatusPublished

This text of 78 S.E. 1023 (Read v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Read v. State, 78 S.E. 1023, 13 Ga. App. 170, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 88 (Ga. Ct. App. 1913).

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

The evidence, although weak, was sufficient to satisfy the jury; and, as no error of law is complained of, the judgment refusing a new trial must be Affirmed.

8. O. Grane, for plaintiff in error. Hugh M. Dorsey, solicitor-general, E. A. Stephens, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
78 S.E. 1023, 13 Ga. App. 170, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 88, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/read-v-state-gactapp-1913.